Science Intelligence and InfoPros

Little things about Scientitic Watch and Information Professionnals

Reading: for citations, scholars rely more on print than on web materials

with one comment

According a recent suty, scholars use web materials but rely more on paper-based material.
The relationship between the print and web citation over time (year) was significant. The most prevalent domain of citations was html and the most favorable and persistent file format was pdf.The web resources are used for their easy accessibility and the support they provide for a scientific content. While direct accessibility to a web citation is not provided, many strategies are adopted to recover the dead citation.
The issue is to what extent the authors rely on web resources and are they finished with citing paper-based materials? Are web resources becoming replaced with their print counterparts? The study showed that scholars still rely more on print resources than on the web materials

Riahinia, N., Zandian, F., Azimi, A.Web citation persistence over time: A retrospective studyElectronic Library, Volume 29, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 609-620.
htttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02640471111177053

Written by hbasset

November 21, 2011 at 5:43 pm

Posted in Journals

Tagged with

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. […] Reading: for citations, scholars rely more on print than on web materials (Science Intelligence and InfoPros) […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: