Posts Tagged ‘Ebooks’
An interesting study to read:
“ RoI can be defined as a performance measure used to quantify and evaluate the efficiency of an investment in library resources or to compare efficiency among different investments. While it may seem simply to be a question of money in versus money out, the real difficulty of expressing the overall value of this resource for an institution comes from many contributing factors:
- Time saved by library staff and researchers
- Convenience of constant access and online search capabilities
- Effect on research output and teaching
- Physical space saved in the library by using electronic resources
RoI can be articulated by libraries to provide justification for ongoing development of collections within an institution and to ensure that current resources may be prioritized in terms of the value they provide to the institution as a whole. (…)
For librarians and administrators working to meet competing demands with limited resources, understanding the value of eBooks will continue to be of great importance for the foreseeable future. The ability to evaluate the most cost-effective and beneficial scholarly content allows for librarians to prioritize resources for their patrons and demonstrate the ongoing value of the library for their institution. (…)
eBooks are anticipated to become as hugely influential over print publications as eJournals have been in the last decade. (…)
Our interviews showed that evaluating usage data is the most common and obvious method for evaluating RoI. Other factors affecting value such as time spent processing records and marketing eBooks to users are often more difficult to quantify. User surveys are a common tool for providing much more context for how library patrons are interacting with eBooks and their perceived value. (…)
eBooks are used much more for individual chapters rather than an entire book... (…)
With the move to electronic content of all kinds, a shift has occurred in the role of librarians themselves. For instance, much more time is being spent on technical issues than 10 years prior. Librarians are now required to have computer expertise, and are charged with training their patrons on how to best make use of these electronic resources to maintain the value of the content…
eBooks are relatively new, compared with 15 years of eJournals, but are likely to continue a rapid rate of adoption in the coming years. The industry is in its early development though, and it will likely be a few years before the percentage of book collections have migrated from print to electronic at the same level journals have. Once this happens, faculty and student usage is likely to increase dramatically…
Read the full paper on:
Scholarly eBooks: understanding the Return on Investment for libraries. White paper, Springer, 2012. 9 p.
– how hospital libraries are facing budget pressure involving clinical staff
– using mobile devices and apps to deliver information to health professionnals
– the new version of Elsevier MDConsult, now called ClinicalKey
– medical e-books at OUP and BMJ
Harris, Sian. Bringing information to doctors. Research Information, Aug./Sept. 2012. pp. 19-21. Available from: http://researchinformation.msgfocus.com/files/amf_europa_science/project_26/RIaug12Web.pdf
Patients as partners: Reports from the Health 2.0 workshop held recently in Lyon, France
An interesting white paper, sponsored by Springer, where 5 consultants give their conclusions after first years of experimentation.
“eBooks have evolved considerably over the last fi ve years, beyond the more mature, but less dynamic eJournals space. Th ey are now poised at an intersection of library, technology and research trends that afford great opportunities and challenges, for both the library and publisher communities.
Similar to the formative years of STM eJournals adoption, eBook uptake shows both promise and challenges:promise as an efficient source for research, and challenges as stakeholders grasp how best to manage this relatively new content format.
In their sixth year, eBooks are entering an Age of Experimentation… (…)
- In Their Infancy: eBooks Helped Librarians and Researchers Work Smarter, But…
- eBooks Today: As Many Questions as There Are Answers
- eBooks Tomorrow: A Bright, If Uncertain, Future
Read the white paper at:
In spite of constant media attention around new forms of technology and especially e-books students still appear to be reticent about embracing new technologies in their studies. (…)
The students in the group, who studied a range of subjects at universities in and around London, felt there was a constant push for them to move to digital but they were resisting it. Although respondents were seeing increasingly more iPads and e-readers at university and they expected more use of e-books in the future, they were unanimous in the hope that this wouldn’t come at the expense of face-to-face time and hard-copy texts. (…)
The students in the focus group said that they used a wide range of online sources and databases (mentions included JSTOR, Project MUSE, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Athens, Emerald journals, LexisLibrary, Westlaw UK, ISI Web of Knowledge and Inspiration). They also used search resources including Google Scholar and Wikipedia. However, it was startling (and distinctly disheartening to the publishers watching the group) how little the students bought digital study resources and e-books. (…)
Medical students had by far the greatest use of apps for their studies…
Kedros, Jenny. Focus group reveals reticence about move to digital. Research Information, 28th of February 2012.
We’ve already heard such arguments below a dozen of times for 2 last years.
Studies on the growth of the e-book market reveal that tablet computers and e-readers may put an end to real paper-based books. The US Book Industry Study Group found that nearly half of those who bought both print and digital books would abandon the hard copies. (…)
“It is only a matter of time before we stop killing trees and all publications become digital,” (…) “The e-book market is developing very fast, with consumer attitudes and behaviors changing over the course of months” (…) Concerns about e-book reading are diminishing, with people mainly wishing for lower device prices (…) Owning e-readers tended to ramp up the amount of money people spent on titles (…)
“I think it is a myth that it is going to kill the print book business,” “Will it force publishers to think differently?” “Absolutely, but it doesn’t spell the demise of print (book) publishing.”
Agence France-Presse.Tablets, e-readers closing book on ink-and-paper era. The Raw Story, posted on Thursday, December 29, 2011. http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/12/29/tablets-e-readers-closing-book-on-ink-and-paper-era/