Archive for September 2010
BlogLines, one of the first Rss feeds agregator, will shut down on November 1.
The main reason: “being locked in an RSS reader makes less and less sense to people as Twitter and Facebook dominate real-time information flow”
What to say to your end-users if you recommended them to set-up their alerts in Bloglines?!
Bloglines Announcement: http://blog.ask.com/2010/09/bloglines-update.html?goback=.gde_67906_member_30666586
A very good study that I missed in 2009.
Vieira, Eliszabeth S. and Gomes, José A.N. A comparison of Scopus and Web of science for a typical university. Scientometrics, Vol.81, N°2, 2009, pp. 587-600
“For many years, the ISI Web of Knowledge from Thomson Reuters was the sole publication and citation database covering all areas of science thus becoming an invaluable tool in bibliometric analysis.
In 2004, Elsevier introduced Scopus and this is rapidly becoming a good alternative.(…)
This paper attempts to answer the question that all researchers ask, i.e., what is to be gained by searching both databases? Or, if you are forced to opt for one of them, which should you prefer?”
- 2/3 of documents are referenced in both databases
- Coverage of some journals in Scopus can be partial
- WoS covers mainly North America and Western European
- Google Scholar has a good coverage for Proceedings, as well as international, non-English language journals
- Ranking of publications are quite similar in Scopus and WoS, not in Google Scholar
- Scopus provides the best coverage in Social Sciences
- There are more journals covered in Scopus than in WoS
- Most of Journals covered by Scopus and not by WoS have a good citation record and are classified in the area Health Sciences.
- Most of documents referenced only in WoS are proceeding-like with no citations
“The general conclusion is that Scopus has a larger coverage, representing, on average, 104% of WoS”.
A few nice resources for non-specialists:
- Patent Research Basics (Dialog): an excellent manual to start with patents. Includes a benchmarking of databases (pp.11-12)
- British Library IP Centre offers several nice guides
- Official publications to monitor new patents: the IPO produces Patents Journal, the EPO publishes European Patent Bulletin, and WIPO its PCT Newsletter.
Janes, Adrian. Selected sources for patent research. FUMSI, September 2010. Online: http://web.fumsi.com/go/article/find/60879
For me, one of the best free sources for non-specialists is:
which is well rated by the experts community Intellogist
“Scientists are spending too much valuable time digging through content. (…)
The main problem isn’t too much information – researchers welcome the value of added content – but discoverability of the right information.
Researchers want to consume more information but don’t want to sift through irrelevant data.”
Judson Dunham (Elsevier, talking about results of the Future of Search and Discovery survey, which leads Elsevier to design SciVerse).
in Research Information, Issue 50, oct/Nov. 2010, pp. 12-13
Look at this very nice hompage, made with Collexis/BioMedExperts.
The Johns Hopkins University offers a wonderful promotion of their researchers.
This unique UK study is focused on the famous Y generation, and on how young researchers behave to find out their information.
Funded by the JISC and the British Library, this 3-year study investigates researchers habits in their digital and physical (library) environment.
One of the confirmation is that “take up of Web 2.0 tools has been slower than expected“, which tends to contradict many clichés.
Hutchings, Charles & Newman, Joanna. Understanding tomorrow’s needs. Research Information, Issue 50, Oct./Nov. 2010. pp. 11