Science Intelligence and InfoPros

Little things about Scientitic Watch and Information Professionnals

Archive for the ‘Patents’ Category

Quote: “Patents do not stifle innovation…”

leave a comment »

Patents do not stifle innovation any more than copyright laws stifle creativity. (…)

Patents ensure the people who put in the time and effort to achieve success are rewarded for that effort, and thereby encourage them to go back to the chalkboard to develop the next big thing. But just as importantly, patents prevent others from reaping all of the benefits of someone else’s endeavors without doing any of the hard/expensive groundwork. ”

Willis, Randall C. Out of order: patently absurd. Drug Discovery News, May 2012. Available from: http://drugdiscoverynews.com/index.php?newsarticle=6127 [Accessed 24th of May 2012]

Advertisements

Written by hbasset

May 24, 2012 at 5:39 pm

Posted in Patents

Tagged with ,

The TOP 100 most innovative companies

leave a comment »

named by Reuters-Thomson, based on a series of patent-related metrics (from DWPI).

Only 2 pure Pharma:

  •  Bayer, Germany
  • BMS, USA
Read further on:
http://www.top100innovators.com/

Written by hbasset

November 16, 2011 at 7:12 pm

Exalead Vs Google!

with one comment

Intellogist, the best source to benchmark patent sources that I know so far, reviews  Exalead, the French Google, …

Exalead is a free search platform that has existed for nearly a decade, and it has developed a range of search features that rival, and sometimes exceed, the features of Google search.  The format of advanced search options on Exalead offers a simpler interface than Google’s multiple advanced search forms.  (…)

 Exalead isn’t a replacement for Google (or any subscription non-patent literature database), but the search platform does possess search features that complement Google’s“.

Mornini, Joelle. How is Exalead better than Google, Intellogist, Posted on September 28, 2011.
http://intellogist.wordpress.com/2011/09/28/an-alternative-to-google-search-exalead/

Written by hbasset

November 4, 2011 at 7:47 pm

Posted in Patents

Tagged with , ,

Conference Programme: ICIC 2011

leave a comment »

Dr Haxel has launched the programme of the International Conference on Trends for Scientific Information Professionals.

http://haxel.com/icic/2011/programme

Written by hbasset

March 24, 2011 at 6:12 pm

Posted in Patents

Tagged with

Patents Thomson Innovation: well rated by Intellogist

with 2 comments

Thomson Innovation, the latest Patent tools by Thomson is well rated by the Intellogist community (in my sense, the best source for patents databases comparison).

http://www.intellogist.com/wiki/Report:Thomson_Innovation/System_Data

Written by hbasset

February 24, 2011 at 5:39 pm

Posted in Patents

Tagged with , ,

The Crème of the Web: introduction to Patents

leave a comment »

A few nice resources for non-specialists:

  • Official Patent Organization guides:

Inspired by:
Janes, Adrian. Selected sources for patent research. FUMSI, September 2010. Online: http://web.fumsi.com/go/article/find/60879

For me, one of the best free sources for non-specialists is:

www.freepatentsonline.com

which is well rated by the experts community Intellogist

Written by hbasset

September 29, 2010 at 7:09 pm

Posted in Patents

Tagged with ,

Google Scholar announces major improvements

with one comment

ResourceShelf seems proud to announce major changes in Google Scholar (GS).

  • Email alerts are now available
  • Syntax has been enhanced to build complex queries
  • Alert on new citations to paper
  • A disruptive (?) feature was introduced, the automatic query modification: according Google, GS alerts “changes your to get better results (for example, [statistical speech recognition] has been changed to [statistical intitle:”speech recognition“]”. No surprise that Google keeps the secrecy about how query modification works!!!

What GS doesn’t do still:

  • Date limits do not work
  • RSS feeds are not yet available
  • List of indexed journals is not published
  • Updating policies are not clear

Written by hbasset

May 12, 2010 at 7:45 pm

Posted in Journals, Patents

Tagged with